Dec 24th 2011, 0:02:23
Originally posted by mrford:
like i said, was there a no grabbing clause in the pact?
i seem to remember NAPs having retal terms and not much else.
i seem to remember NAPs having retal terms and not much else.
A NON-AGRESSIVE PACT is based on NO grabbing. The only reason somebody would sign a NAP is because they don't want to exchange grabs/retals with the other alliance, but still have the option to break the pact (if the other alliance ended up at war with one of your DPs).
that being said, if you sign a NAP, then it can be cancelled at any point for ANY reason (usually with FA contact), so technically MD haven't done anything wrong - morally or contractually.
re(ally)tired